DFI AK74-SC VIA KT133
Friday, September 29, 2000
The performance tests results
|
|
|
Motherboard
|
BIOS
|
Chipset
|
Drivers
|
|
DFI AK74-SC
|
unknow
|
VIA KT-133
|
VIA 4-in-1 4.23
|
|
Processor
|
Memory
|
Hard disk drive
|
Graphic card
|
|
AMD Athlon T-Bird 1Ghz
|
128Mb PC133 CAS2
|
Quantum KA 9.1
|
GeForce 256 SDR
|
|
|
|
Operating system
|
Built
|
Video drivers
|
DirectX
|
|
Windows98
|
4.10 1998
|
Nvidia 4.11.01.0368
|
7.0a
|
|
|
|
Game
|
Resolution
|
Refresh
|
Vsync
|
Color
|
Texture
|
Filtration
|
|
Quake2 3.20
|
800 X 600
|
75Hz
|
Off
|
16-bit
|
16-bit
|
bi-linear
|
|
Game
|
Resolution
|
Refresh
|
Vsync
|
Color
|
Texture
|
Filtration
|
|
Quake3 1.08
|
800 X 600
|
75Hz
|
Off
|
16-bit
|
16-bit
|
Tri-linear
|
Suggested memory to use
Corsair 128Mb Sdram PC133 CAS2
Mushkin 128Mb Sdram PC133 CAS2 = Tested
Micron 128Mb Sdram PC133 CAS2
Transcend 128Mb Sdram PC133
Winstone99 - Winbench99
|
Ziff Davis Winstone99 - Winbench99
|
|
Winbench CPUmark99
|
89.36
|
|
Business Winstone99
|
33.1
|
|
Content Creation 2000
|
33.7
|
Bapco Sysmark2000
|
Benchmark
|
|
Official Run
|
186
|
Video sub-system tests
|
Quake2 version 3.20
|
AMD Athlon Classique 1Ghz @ 1Ghz
|
AMD Athlon Classique @ 1030hz
|
|
800 X 600 X 75Hz X 16-bit
|
181.38 FPS
|
182.05
|
Quake3 Test 1.08
|
AMD Athlon Classique 1Ghz @ 1Ghz
|
AMD Athlon Classique 1Ghz @ 1030Mhz
|
|
800 X 600 X 75Hz X 16-bit
|
101.3 FPS
|
102.27
|
As in most cases, our ability to Overclock the system was ultimately limited by the memory installed. Thus, 103MHz was the best we could achieve. Note, however, that the results we obtained were actually quite good, and certainly more than satisfying. Of course, by changing the memory CAS latency from 2 to 3 we could have used a higher Overclocking frequency but this would have mean no significant gains because at a slower CAS latency the Overclocking gains would have become practically insignificant.
Disk sub-system tests
Overall Quality Evaluation
The evaluation table below shows both the strong and weak points of the tested motherboard. No need to remind you that performance is not the sole purchasing criteria in a motherboard. Most of today's motherboards exhibit performance very close to each other, so we need additional information in order to help us distinguish the real advantages of a motherboard compared to its competitors. This is exactly where this evaluation table comes in handy.
|
|
|
Feature
|
Evaluation
|
|
Design Originality
|
Poor
|
Good
|
Average
|
Excellent
|
Top Grade
|
3
|
Component Layout
|
Poor
|
Good
|
Average
|
Excellent
|
Top Grade
|
4
|
|
Heatsink space around CPU
|
Poor
|
Good
|
Average
|
Excellent
|
Top Grade
|
5
|
Capacitiors
|
Poor
|
Good
|
Average
|
Excellent
|
Top Grade
|
4
|
|
CPU Retention Mechanism
|
Poor
|
Good
|
Average
|
Excellent
|
Top Grade
|
3
|
|
Amounts of Expansion Slots
|
Poor
|
Good
|
Average
|
Excellent
|
Top Grade
|
5
|
|
Amount of Memory sockets
|
Poor
|
Good
|
Average
|
Excellent
|
Top Grade
|
4
|
|
Ease of installation
|
Poor
|
Good
|
Average
|
Excellent
|
Top Grade
|
5
|
|
BIOS Setup Design
|
Poor
|
Good
|
Average
|
Excellent
|
Top Grade
|
3
|
|
Performance
|
Poor
|
Good
|
Average
|
Excellent
|
Top Grade
|
5
|
|
Overclockability
|
Poor
|
Good
|
Average
|
Excellent
|
Top Grade
|
4
|
|
Stability
|
Poor
|
Good
|
Average
|
Excellent
|
Top Grade
|
5
|
|
Bundled Software
|
Poor
|
Good
|
Average
|
Excellent
|
Top Grade
|
5
|
|
Bundled Hardware
|
Poor
|
Good
|
Average
|
Excellent
|
Top Grade
|
3
|
|
Users Manual Quality
|
Poor
|
Good
|
Average
|
Excellent
|
Top Grade
|
3
|
|
Packing Quality
|
Poor
|
Good
|
Average
|
Excellent
|
Top Grade
|
5
|
|
Features supported
|
ATA66
|
PC133
|
Wake On LAN
|
Modem ring
|
Pwr Fail Res
|
5
|
|
Features supported (suite)
|
Sensor
|
AMR
|
Mouse Pwr On
|
Susp. to RAM
|
Susp. to Disk
|
3
|
|
Features supported (suite)
|
IRDA
|
SCSI
|
Keyb. Pwr On
|
Hardw. mon.
|
Vcore adj.
|
3
|
|
Features supported (suite)
|
RAID
|
Alarm
|
Jumperless
|
L2 latency adj.
|
IRQ assign.
|
2
|
|
Total Score obtainned for this motherboard
|
79 points out of 100
|
|
Features color codes: Blue = supported, Red = optional, Black = not supported
|
Conclusions
|
The weak points
No Vcore adjustment in the BIOS
No ability to manually assign IRQs
Puny hardware pack
Badly conceived user's manual
|
|
The strong points
Excellent performance
Great stability
Lots of space available for a CPU heatsink
Independent memory bus
Integrated hardware monitoring
Integrated AC"97 sound-card
|
Special mentions
During its brief stay at our labs, the AK74-SC nevertheless managed to make quite an impression. To put it simply: it's fast, and incredibly stable. Of course, we would have liked to have seen a couple of other features - most notably an ability to adjust the CPUs Vcore voltage, and possible a Dual BIOS system - but those bits functionality never seemed to make it onto the DFI AK74-SC. Even if this is board will not really appeal to Overclocking enthusiasts, there is simply no questioning its overall quality. In short, the AK74-SC is one product we wouldn't hesitate to recommend.
For more information, visit DFI.
You can discuss this article in the Forum